Jeremy Goldstein is a graduate with a J.D from the New York University. He is a partner at Jeremy L. Goldstein & Associates LLC, a firm that specializes and deals with advising reimbursement committees, management teams, CEOs, and cooperation s in executive compensation. Jeremy Goldstein was a partner at Watchell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz before starting his law firm. Goldstein has taken part in numerous large corporate transactions for the past ten years one of them being the acquisition of Goodrich by United Technologies.

In the Professional Advisory Board of the NYU Journal of Law and Business and New Leadership Council of Make-A-Wish Foundation, Jeremy Goldstein is a member and serves on the Board of Directors of Fountain House in the capacity of a member.

In an article, Jeremy Goldstein explains the importance of knockout alternatives to employers. Most firms consider knock out options merely to save money. However, three significant reasons coax employers to control the benefits. One of this problems is; a substantial drop in the company’s stock value may make it difficult for employees to exercise their alternatives. The second one is a considerable number of employees has become cautious of the compensation method. Lastly, due to accounting loads stock options may make the relevant cost higher than the financial benefits.

According to Jeremy Goldstein, stock options have advantages. Stock options have the simplicity to understand and provision of equal value to all employees. They also increase staff morale since a rise in a company’s share prices increases personal earnings. Employees may strive to enhance client gratification and attract other potential customers. Stock options have lesser tax burdens compared to the provision of equities. Firms can provide stock options to their employees and shun immoderate costs if they adopt a proper strategy. They show lower executive compensation numbers hence the earnings posted by the company yearly are more accurate. Stock options reduce accounting costs in the beginning if the company’s stock is relatively variable. Besides when company’s use knockout options advantages, investors that are not employees don’t face overhang menace options.

However, while considering stock options, a firm should make considerations have to be put in place. It is vital for companies to know that knockout options do not give a solution to all problems but they remove a considerable number of obstacles. Company officials should also involve auditors while providing their employees with the options. Learn more:

Jeremy Goldstein Shares his Thoughts on Stock Options for Employers

Jeremy L. Goldstein & Associates is a business-law law firm based out of New York. Jeremy Goldstein, at its helm, leads the firm in assisting CEOs and management teams on sensitive issues. Before leading his own company, Goldstein was a partner at another large law firm in New York. Goldstein also serves as a chair in a Mergers & Acquisition department with the American Bar Association. His expertise in mergers & acquisitions has lead to Goldstein being involved in many of the biggest mergers in recent history. Goldstein was involved in the Chevron Texaco and Unocal deal. He was involved in a deal with Verizon as well. In addition to his main career, Goldstein also likes to share his expertise with the public through his writings. Recently Goldstein shared his views on stock options with his readers; he explained both the pros and the cons to offering stock options to employees. On one side, if you provide stocks to your employees and your company goes through a negative growth spell, it could create loss of moral in the workplace. On the other hand, if your employees are directly involved in the company in such a way it could motivate them to work hard. This could improve productivity on a company wide scale. There is one other issue that employers should be worried about. Do their employees have the knowledge to manage their own stocks? If the employee is required to hire someone to manage their stock portfolio for them, it could result in service charges higher than the annual growth of their stocks. Stock options are one of the more preferred options when a company wants to provide bonuses to its employees. By providing employees with cheaper stock options instead of cash bonuses, a company can save both parties the stress of an increased tax burden. Learn more: